Getting to net zero carbon emissions is becoming surprisingly affordable!

 Researchers have found that the cost to transfer to net zero carbon emissions is lowering with the lowering cost of the technologies required to clean energy. If we start our reduction of carbon emissions by 2030 we will be able to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050. If this is achieve the main effects of global warming will be avoided. In order to reach this goal massive transfers to clean energy would be required and the changing of the infrastructure of oil companies as well as others. Individuals would need to transfer to clean heating and clean electric.

This is important information to know and understand. We need to change the course of global warming in order to stop its catastrophic effects. Knowing that the cost of transferring is lowering is greatly important as it can assist many peoples and the worlds transfer to clean energy. 

Source: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210127122410.htm


Comments

  1. AnonymousFebruary 16, 2021 at 6:33 PM

    It would be hard to get everyone to cooperate with such a big shift, but it is hopeful to see that it is still possible to make this change. There would be many willing people to make the change, if it was easy and cost-friendly for them to do so. Right now, the standard systems we use aren't the clean ones. If we made the clean ones standard instead, many people would cooperate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 17, 2021 at 7:14 AM

    I think that it would certainly be incredible if we were to be able to get carbon emissions to a net of zero, however unlikely it seems with bigger businesses only out for the sake of profit. In order for this to take place however, I wonder would would have to take place, besides just the transfer of massive companies to more clean practices, of course. Would general consumers have to switch to more clean practices, such as biodiesels and the like? I feel that although the cost might SEEM low, especially in comparison to the amount of power and wealth the government holds, the cost in money to the average consumer or citizen affected might be too much, especially for lower income persons.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dual-fuel vehicles

A recent study shows that dual- fuel vehicles are benefiting the population but, turns out they are costing the environment. While substituting gasoline for ethanol gases, it causes an increase of ultra fine particle matter, with a 30% increase of atmospheric concentration. The problem is that they are less then 50 nanometers in diameter. The nano particles are also not track or regulated by the environmental agencies. We inhale these gases everyday, inhaling ethanol. The most practical way to reduce greenhouse gases is using electric, hybrid and biofuel care.   https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170828124546.htm
Read more

Acid Zone in Chesapeake Bay Found

     According to the University of Delaware, the Chesapeake Bay is becoming acidic as it has gone to 7.4 pH from an average of 8.2. The oxidation of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide may be the factor that is leading to the higher acidity levels in coastal oceans, but it can eventually lead to more of open oceans. Naturally the waters of the Chesapeake Bay have a regulatory system that holds back the increase of acidity levels in the area, and this works as the dissolving of living shells, non-living aragonite, and calcite minerals. Though nature has a path to keep the waters in the Chesapeake Bay, humans should take more care of our Earth as we have a role in polluting the water and rising the acidity levels in coastal oceans. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170828093737.htm
Read more